May
2003
Volume
80
Number
3
Pages
285
—
289
Authors
Muhammad A.
Shahin
2
and
Stephen J.
Symons
2
,
3
Affiliations
Paper 843 of the Grain Research Laboratory, Canadian Grain Commission, 1404-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada, R3C 3G8.
Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Corresponding author. E-mail: ssymons@grainscanada.gc.ca.
Go to Article:
RelatedArticle
Accepted November 18, 2002.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Scanner technology is emerging as a cost-effective and robust imaging alternative to camera-based systems in many applications. However, scanner technology is changing so fast that image quality can vary from model to model. It is critical that images scanned with different scanners be brought to a common basis for processing and measurement through a calibration process that eliminates scanner-to-scanner variability. The focus of this research was to investigate scanner-to-scanner variability and develop color correction or mapping functions to allow for machineindependent grain inspection. Various makes and models of scanners were compared for optical and color characteristics. Three different color correction methods wereevaluated: grayscale (GS) transformation, redgreen-blue (RGB) transformation, and histogram matching. All three models of color correction worked within satisfactory tolerance for a multicolor Q60 chart. However, for grain samples of a limited color range, the histogram matching approach performed better than GS and RGB transformations for scanner calibration. The color-corrected test images matched the reference images within 3 grey values. Differences between the three models of color correction are discussed.
JnArticleKeywords
ArticleCopyright
This article is in the public domain and not copyrightable. It may be freely reprinted with customary crediting of the source. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., 2003.